Preparation of Solifenacin Succinate Functional Particles Embedded in a Gelling-Swelling Layer (PEGS) and Their Formulation in Orally Disintegrating Tablets.

The purpose of this research was firstly to prepare solifenacin succinate functional particles embedded in a gelling-swelling layer (PEGS) so as to achieve both taste-masking of the unpleasant taste of the drug and rapid drug elution, and secondly to incorporate these PEGS into orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs). In in vitro dissolution tests, initial drug release from the prepared PEGS could be suppressed to less than 1% after 2 min and increased to more than 85% after 30 min by adjusting the composition of the PEGS, in particular the thickness of the outer water-penetration control layer which contains a water-insoluble polymer. For the preparation of ODTs containing PEGS, a semi-direct compression method was adopted in order to prevent damage to the PEGS by processes such as granulation or compaction. The use of a fibre-shaped microcrystalline cellulose with poor fluidity improved the content uniformity of the ODTs, as the crystal fibres became entangled with the PEGS and other additives. The use of spherical mannitol with a hollow structure produced by spray drying imparted relatively high hardness and rapid disintegration properties to the final ODTs containing PEGS, which were tableted using a low compression force. There was no significant difference in the drug-release profiles of the optimally formulated ODTs containing PEGS tableted at different compression forces. The ODTs containing PEGS maintained a drug-release lag time sufficient for taste-masking of solifenacin succinate.

Pharmacokinetics of solifenacin in pediatric populations with overactive bladder or neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

The aim of this investigation was to characterize and compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the antimuscarinic drug solifenacin in pediatric patients with overactive bladder (OAB) or neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) utilizing data from three phase III trials. LION was a placebo-controlled, 12-week trial in children (5-<12 years) and adolescents (12-<18 years) with OAB. MONKEY and MARMOSET were open-label, 52-week trials in children and adolescents or younger children (6 months-<5 years), respectively, with NDO. During the trials, solifenacin doses could be titrated to weight-adjusted pediatric equivalent doses (PEDs) of 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 mg day-1 . Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to develop population PK models to characterize the PK in patients with either OAB or NDO. Overall, 194 children and adolescents received solifenacin. At the time of PK sampling, the majority (119/164 [72.6%] patients) were receiving PED10 once daily. All population models included first-order oral absorption, a lag time, and interindividual variability. PK analysis showed that apparent clearance was similar in both patient populations. Mean apparent oral plasma clearance (CL/F), apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase (Vz /F), and terminal half-life (t1/2 ) were higher in adolescents than in children, but median time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax ) was similar. Dose-normalized exposure results were similar for both younger and older patients with OAB or NDO. In conclusion, population PK modeling was used to successfully characterize solifenacin PK in pediatric patients with OAB or NDO. Similar solifenacin PK characteristics were observed in both populations.

Efficacy and safety of dose escalation in male patients with overactive bladder showing poor efficacy after low-dose antimuscarinic treatment: A retrospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of standard-dose antimuscarinic treatment on male patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms showing poor efficacy after low-dose antimuscarinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 566 male patients aged ≥40 with OAB symptoms between January 2017 and June 2018. They were treated with low-dose antimuscarinics for at least 4 weeks and showed poor efficacy; therefore, they were switched to standard dose antimuscarinic treatment (5 mg of solifenacin) for ≥12 weeks. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) at baseline (V0), 4 weeks (V1), and 12 weeks (V2) were analyzed. Post void residual urine volume (PVR) was also recorded. RESULTS: The median age, body mass index, and prostate-specific antigen levels were 69.0 years, 24.2 kg/m², and 1.24 ng/dL, respectively. The mean value of the total IPSS and OABSS significantly decreased between V0 and V2 (from 16.73 to 13.69 and 7.33 to 5.34, respectively, all p<0.001). All component scores from each questionnaire demonstrated a significant decrease except for numbers three and six on the IPSS questionnaire. PVR was increased from V0 to V2 (36.40 to 68.90 mL, p=0.015). Four and nine patients experienced constipation and thirst, respectively, and all adverse effects were graded as ≤2. CONCLUSIONS: Standard dose antimuscarinic treatment using solifenacin (5 mg) may be a safe and effective treatment for patients with OAB symptoms refractory to low-dose antimuscarinic treatment.

Mirabegron Versus Solifenacin in Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Overactive Bladder Symptoms: A Prospective Comparative Nonrandomized Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the patient-perceived effectiveness and tolerability of mirabegron compared to solifenacin in a multiple sclerosis (MS) population with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MS patients with OAB symptoms who were not on medication for their urinary symptoms at enrollment were prospectively recruited. Patients enrolled in years 1-2 were prescribed mirabegron, whereas patients enrolled in years 3-4 were prescribed solifenacin. At enrollment and 6-week follow-up, patients completed several patient reported outcome measures. The primary outcome was change in OAB Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) symptom severity and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) was used to assess bowel function over the treatment period. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. The majority of the mirabegron (70%) and the solifenacin (69%) group achieved the OAB-q SF symptom severity MCID. The solifenacin group had a statistically significant greater decrease in its end of study OAB-q SF score (Δ = -37.87 vs -20.43, P = .02). Constipation improved in the mirabegron group and worsened in the solifenacin group (ΔPAC-SYM = -0.38 vs +0.22; P = .02), with 30% of patients prescribed solifenacin experiencing worsening above the MCID threshold. CONCLUSION: Among MS patients, we demonstrated similar response rates to mirabegron and solifenacin, with approximately 50%-70% achieving each patient reported outcome measure's MCID. Though this small study showed some short-term evidence that improvement in urinary symptom severity was greater with solifenacin, this potential benefit must be weighed against the observed risk of worsening constipation. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparision effects of solifenacin, darifenacin, propiverine on ocular parameters in eyes: A prospective study

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the effects of solifenacin, darifenacin, and propiverine on nasal-, subfoveal-, temporal choroidal thicknesses (NCT, SFCT, TCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) and pupil diameter (PD). Materials and Methods Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) diagnosed according to The International Continence Society were administered with solifenacin, darifenacin or propiverine on a daily basis between November 2017 and May 2018. NCT, SFCT, TCT, IOP, and PD of these patients were measured and compared as initial, fourth and twelfth weeks. Results A total of 165 patients (330 eyes) with OAB were evaluated. Solifenacin (n=140) significantly reduced IOP from 17.30±2.72 mmHg to 16.67±2.56 mmHg (p=0.006) and 16.57±2.41 mmHg (p=0.002), at the fourth and twelfth weeks, respectively. Darifenacin (n=110) significantly reduced NCT from 258.70±23.96 μm to 257.51±22.66 μm (p=0.002) and 255.36±19.69 μm (p=0.038), at the fourth and twelfth weeks, respectively. Propiverine (n=80) significantly increased PD from 4.04±0.48 mm to 4.08±0.44 mm (p=0.009) and 4.09±0.45 mm (p=0.001), at the fourth and twelfth weeks, respectively. Conclusion These findings can help to decide appropriate anticholinergic drug choice in OAB patients. We finally suggest further well-designed randomized prospective studies with a larger population to evaluate the anticholinergic-related complications in eyes.

Comparision effects of solifenacin, darifenacin, propiverine on ocular parameters in eyes: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of solifenacin, darifenacin, and propiverine on nasal-, subfoveal-, temporal choroidal thicknesses (NCT, SFCT, TCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) and pupil diameter (PD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) diagnosed according to The International Continence Society were administered with solifenacin, darifenacin or propiverine on a daily basis between November 2017 and May 2018. NCT, SFCT, TCT, IOP, and PD of these patients were measured and compared as initial, fourth and twelfth weeks. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients (330 eyes) with OAB were evaluated. Solifenacin (n=140) signifi cantly reduced IOP from 17.30±2.72 mmHg to 16.67±2.56 mmHg (p=0.006) and 16.57±2.41 mmHg (p=0.002), at the fourth and twelfth weeks, respectively. Darifenacin (n=110) signifi cantly reduced NCT from 258.70±23.96 µm to 257.51±22.66 µm (p=0.002) and 255.36±19.69 µm (p=0.038), at the fourth and twelfth weeks, respectively. Propiverine (n=80) signifi cantly increased PD from 4.04±0.48 mm to 4.08±0.44 mm (p=0.009) and 4.09±0.45 mm (p=0.001), at the fourth and twelfth weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings can help to decide appropriate anticholinergic drug choice in OAB patients. We finally suggest further well-designed randomized prospective studies with a larger population to evaluate the anticholinergic-related complications in eyes.

Duloxetine reverses the symptoms of overactive bladder co-existing with depression via the central pathways.

Though the association between overactive bladder (OAB) and depression was noticed years ago, the pharmaceutical market does not offer one universal drug that would cure both conditions at the same time. The main goal of our present experiments was to determine whether a 14-day administration of solifenacin (0.03 mg/kg/day), mirabegron (1 mg/kg/day), or duloxetine (1 mg/kg/day) would reverse detrusor overactivity and depression-like signs in female Wistar rats subjected to corticosterone treatment. Surgical procedures, cystometric studies, biochemical analyses, and the forced swim test were performed according to published literature. After 14 days of exposure to corticosterone (20 mg/kg/day, subcutaneously), the tested animals presented symptoms of depression, detrusor overactivity, inflammation, and disturbances in neurotrophic factors. The obtained results demonstrated that solifenacin and mirabegron act mainly via peripheral pathways in OAB, whereas the central pathways are responsible for the effects of duloxetine. 72 h after discontinuation of duloxetine treatment, positive changes in the corticosterone-induced depression, detrusor overactivity, and inflammation were observed. Duloxetine seems to have a potential to become a new treatment option for patients with OAB co-existing with depression.

Cardiovascular safety of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients with overactive bladder who had a suboptimal response to mirabegron monotherapy: A post hoc analysis from the Japanese MILAI II study.

OBJECTIVE: This analysis was conducted to investigate the cardiovascular (CV) safety outcomes from the MILAI II study. MILAI II was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic add-on therapy to mirabegron over 52 weeks in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. METHODS: MILAI II consisted of a 2-week screening period (patients received mirabegron 50 mg once daily) plus a 52-week treatment period (patients were randomized to receive a combination of mirabegron 50 mg/d plus solifenacin 5 mg/d, propiverine 20 mg/d, imidafenacin 0.2 mg/d, or tolterodine 4 mg/d). CV safety was assessed using treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). Vital signs and ECG data were evaluated for each patient using worst post-baseline values reported. RESULTS: Of 647 patients, 570 (88.1%) were female with a mean age of 65 years. CV history at baseline and CV-related concomitant medication use throughout the study were balanced between groups. The incidences of overall and drug-related CV TEAEs were ≤8.1% and ≤6.2%, respectively, for all groups. The most common TEAEs were ECG T wave amplitude decreased, ECG QT prolonged, and ventricular extrasystoles. Overall, 36 TEAEs of interest related to the CV system that were possibly/probably related to treatment were reported with similar incidences for each group. For the worst post-baseline vital signs and ECGs, no relationships were noted in terms of either timing or treatment group. CONCLUSION: A favorable CV safety profile was observed following long-term combination treatment with mirabegron and an antimuscarinic in patients with OAB symptoms.

Comparison of Oral Sodium Bicarbonate and Solifenacin Treatment in Female Overactive Bladder Patients With Acidic Urine pH.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we planned to compare the effects of oral sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and anticholinergic (solifenacin) treatments in women with overactive bladder (OAB) and acidic urine pH values (<6). METHODS: According to the referral order of OAB patients, 8 g/d oral NaHCO3 (group 1) or 5 mg/d solifenacin succinate (group 2) was given to the patients. Both treatment regimens were applied one at a time for 12 weeks in total. Laboratory values, bladder diary, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition score, Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale, Overactive Bladder-Validated 8-Question Awareness Tool, and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) scores before and after treatment were compared. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were evaluated. Thirty-one patients were included in group 1, and 28 patients were included in group 2. No difference was detected in pretreatment and posttreatment laboratory values other than urine pH values in both groups. Whereas there was no difference in pretreatment urine pH values among the 2 groups, posttreatment urine pH values were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (P = 0.08, P < 0.001, respectively). There was a significant amelioration in the bladder diary parameters, symptom scores, and KHQ values measured after treatment in both groups. However, degree of amelioration in posttreatment outcomes was similar among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: It was demonstrated that urinary alkalization made with oral NaHCO3 in female OAB patients with acidic urine pH had a significantly positive effect on symptoms and symptom scores, and these results are similar to the results of solifenacin treatment.

Evaluation of in Vitro and in Vivo Transdermal Absorption of Solifenacin Succinate.

Solifenacin (Sol), an antimuscarinic agent has been widely used for the treatment of overactive bladder. Transdermal formulations can be administered without water as well as absorbed slowly into the blood over a long period of time. The aim of this study was to develop cream and tape formulations of Sol, and evaluate the transdermal permeation and absorption of the drug from the two formulations in vitro and in vivo, respectively. In the preparation of cream formulation, Sol succinate was dissolved in purified water, and the mixture was added to the hydrophilic cream. Then, aqueous sodium hydroxide was added to the cream. In the tape formulation, Sol succinate was dissolved in a solvent with propylene glycol, diisopropanolamine, triethyl citrate, and EUDRAGIT E100. The dissolved solvent was poured onto a polyethylene film. Cream (5%) and tape (15%) formulations demonstrated high skin permeability. Addition of an adsorption enhancer (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone) did not further increase the level of skin permeability. In subsequent in vivo experiments in rats, both the cream and tape formulations led to slow absorption of Sol into plasma, with increased t1/2 compared with oral administration. Plasma Sol concentrations peaked 24 h after transdermal application and the drug was still detectable in plasma 72 h after application. Additionally, the cream (5%) and tape (15%) formulations resulted in a higher area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from 0 to 72 h (AUC0-72) compared with oral formulation (30 mg/kg). In conclusion, significant in vitro permeability and in vivo absorption of Sol from the transdermal formulations were observed.

The probability of re-treatment after discontinuation of a 3-month versus a 6-month course of solifenacin for female overactive bladder: A prospective randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the re-treatment probabilities after a 3-month versus a 6-month course of antimuscarinic treatment for women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Between-group differences in the probability of re-treatment for OAB between the 3-month and 6-month groups. METHODS: Women with OAB were randomly allocated to receive solifenacin (5 mg per day) for a treatment interval of either 3 or 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were treated in each group. The probability of re-treatment did not differ between the 3-month and 6-month groups (P = 0.11). Parity (hazard ratio = 1.81, P = 0.001), number of incontinence episodes (hazard ratio = 1.09, P = 0.008) and suboptimal response (hazard ratio = 3.56, P = 0.006) were independent predictors of re-treatment of OAB. Physical limitation, as indicated on the King's Health Questionnaire, was the only independent factor predicting completion of the scheduled treatment period (odds ratio = 1.01, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged antimuscarinic treatment does not decrease the need for re-treatment of OAB. Nonetheless, female patients with increased parity, more severe incontinence and a suboptimal response to antimuscarinic treatment are more likely to seek re-treatment of OAB due to recurrence of symptoms. In addition, patients with more serious physical limitation related to OAB are more likely to complete the scheduled treatment period. These findings could serve as a guide in clinical consultations regarding antimuscarinic treatment and if taken into consideration in future studies could lower the dropout rate.

Sialorrhea Successfully Treated by the Combined Use of Selective M1 and M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonists.

Sialorrhea is often treated with anticholinergic agents, but they can have undesirable side effects such as drowsiness, sedation, and constipation. Effective medication that acts selectively on the salivary glands is needed. We report the case of a patient with sialorrhea who was successfully treated by the combined use of pirenzepine and solifenacin (M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor antagonists, respectively). The patient was a 51-year-old man with mean unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates per 10 min of 6.1 mL and 41.7 mL, respectively (both were measured three times). 99mTcO4- salivary gland scintigraphy revealed characteristic spontaneous saliva secretion without stimulation. He was treated with Scopolia extract, escitalopram, solifenacin succinate, and the combined administration of solifenacin succinate and pirenzepine. A statistically significant decrease was observed from the pre-medication unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates only following the combined administration of solifenacin and pirenzepine. The major muscarinic receptor subtype expressed in the salivary glands is M3; however, M1 is also present. A study using knockout mice demonstrated that the presence of either M1 or M3 receptors was sufficient for salivation. Thus, the combined use of selective M1 and M3 antagonists could provide a good treatment option for sialorrhea.

Overactive bladder - pharmacological treatment.

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

Does Pharmacological Treatment Reduce the Incidence of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) after Transobturator Sling?

AIM: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) frequently affect patients immediately after midurethral sling (MUS) placement. The objective of the study was to assess if solifenacin or mirabegron decreases incidence of LUTS in women who underwent transobturator MUS. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was conducted on patients undergoing ambulatory transobturator midurethral sling due to stress urinary incontinence (SUI). All participants were questioned before and after surgery for occurrence of bothersome LUTS. A total of 328 patients who underwent transobturator MUS were randomly assigned to one of three groups: prophylaxis with 10 mg of solifenacin, prophylaxis with 50 mg of mirabegron, or without any additional treatment. LUTS evolution and efficacy of solifenacin and mirabegron were analyzed based on results of assessments made during follow-up visits at 1 and 6 weeks after surgery. Comparison of the prevalence of LUTS was done using chi2 test. RESULTS: Prevalence of urgency and frequency episodes increased notably 1 week after sling placement and then came down to baseline levels. Solifenacin and mirabegron significantly reduced the incidence of urgency after 1 week, but after 6 weeks the beneficial effect was observed only in case of solifenacin. Treatment with mirabegron reduced the percentage of patients suffering from frequency after 6 weeks. Although prevalence of nocturia did not raise after sling placement, both treatments significantly reduced the incidence of this complaint after 6 weeks. Pharmacological treatment did not modulate the course of hesitancy and terminal dribbling. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with solifenacin or mirabegron may significantly reduce the incidence of undesired LUTS after MUS.

Overactive bladder - pharmacological treatment

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

Seguridad y eficacia a largo plazo del tratamiento combinado con mirabegrón y solifenacina en comparación con la monoterapia en pacientes con vejiga hiperactiva: estudio SYNERGY II / Long-term safety and efficacy of mirabegron and solifenacin in combination compared with monotherapy in patients with overactive bladder: SYNERGY II study

No disponible

Long-term safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients with overactive bladder who had a suboptimal response to mirabegron monotherapy: A multicenter, randomized study in Japan (MILAI II study).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety (primary objective) and efficacy (secondary objective) of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients receiving mirabegron. METHODS: During a 2-week screening period, patients (aged ≥20 years, mirabegron treatment for ≥6 weeks, residual overactive bladder symptoms) received mirabegron 50 mg once daily. These patients were subsequently randomized to 52 weeks' treatment with mirabegron 50 mg/day plus an antimuscarinic (solifenacin 5 mg, propiverine 20 mg, imidafenacin 0.2 mg, or tolterodine 4 mg) with the potential to double the antimuscarinic dose (except for tolterodine) at week 8. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, post-void residual volume, and laboratory evaluations. Efficacy was assessed using changes from baseline in overactive bladder symptom score total score; overactive bladder questionnaire short form score; micturitions, urgency episodes, urinary incontinence episodes, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes/24 h; mean volume voided per micturition; and number of night-time micturitions. RESULTS: Overall, 80.2% of patients (88.1% women, mean age 65 years) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, with similar rates for all treatments. The adverse events most commonly reported were dry mouth, nasopharyngitis, and constipation. No marked change was observed in systolic or diastolic blood pressure for any treatment, although pulse rate increased slightly in the mirabegron and propiverine, and mirabegron and tolterodine groups. For all treatments, significant improvements were observed in all efficacy parameters, including overactive bladder symptom score total and questionnaire short form scores. CONCLUSIONS: Antimuscarinic add-on therapy is well tolerated and effective after initial treatment with mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder symptoms.

The Effect of Anticholinergics for Prevention of Storage Symptoms After Prostate Photovaporization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral anticholinergics as a preventive strategy of storage symptoms and urinary incontinence associated with the early postoperative period after Greenlight laser photovaporization of the prostate (PVP). To analyze potential variables related to the onset of these symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 105 patients who underwent PVP using a 180-W Greenlight laser (XPS). Patients were divided into two groups, depending on whether they were or weren´t prescribed anticholinergics when discharged (oral solifenacin 5 mg for 1 month after surgery). Differences between both groups were analyzed according to IPSS, ICIQ-SF and OABq-SF scores at 1 and 6 months. The potentially predictive variables of the symptomatology after undergoing PVP that we analyzed included age, prostate volume, PSA, IPSS, ICIQ-SF, OABq-SF, Qmax, previous use of a permanent urinary catheter, energy used, and laser application time. RESULTS: 58 patients in the group with anticholinergics and 47 in the group without anticholinergics were compared. No significant differences were observed between both groups in IPSS (p = .521), ICIQ-SF (p = .720) or OABq-SF (p = .851) at 1 and 6 months after surgery. Regardless of the use of anticholinergics, there was a significant score improvement between the first and second checkup in all the questionnaires: there was a significant decrease in the mean IPSS (p < .001) and the mean score of the eighth IPSS question on patient's quality of life (p = .026), ICIQ- SF (p = .010) and OAB-q related to symptoms (p = .001) as well as a significant increase in the mean OAB-q score regarding quality of life (p = .005). None of the variables analyzed showed a significant relation to the storage-symptom rate, rate of incontinence, or ICIQ-SF and OABq-SF scores. CONCLUSIONS: The use of solifenacin 5 mg after Greenlight laser PVP is not an effective preventive treatment for storage and incontinence symptoms associated with this procedure, which seem to self-limit over time.

Effect of combined solifenacin and aclatonium in preventing dry mouth in patients with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of aclatonium on dry mouth in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) after treatment with solifenacin. METHODS: A multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted. The study subjects were men and women who had been diagnosed with OAB for ≥3 months and presented with a total Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) ≥3. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive 5 mg solifenacin with placebo or 5 mg solifenacin with 150 mg aclatonium once daily for 8 weeks. Subjects rated dry mouth using a visual analog scale (VAS) and completed the OAB-questionnaire (OAB-q) short form (SF) and OABSS questionnaires at baseline and after 8 weeks treatment. Dry mouth was defined as a VAS score >30 points (range 0-100). RESULTS: Overall, 92 patients (49 and 43 in the placebo and aclatonium groups, respectively) completed the 8-week treatment. In patients who had dry mouth at baseline, no differences were detected in changes in the dry mouth VAS, OABSS, or OAB-q SF scores between the 2 groups. However, in patients who had no dry mouth at baseline, the change in dry mouth VAS score was significantly lower in the aclatonium- than placebo-treated group: the VAS score increased 20 points in the placebo group compared with 9 points in the aclatonium group (P = .03). However, there were no significant differences in changes in the OABSS and OAB-q SF scores between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aclatonium decreased dry mouth without disturbing treatment efficacy in patients who did not have dry mouth before treatment.